PS: Don't get me wrong! I'm pro making Linux more used, to get better driver support, but I'm completely against it, if it's done by abandon diversity and configurability. You might argue that providing a GUI would still enable to use an editor instead. No, take a look at the Wikis, than they only will explain how to use the GUI, without mentioning how to do it with an editor. And we will get "don't edit this file"-text and lines of irrelevant code for the configurations. [root@archlinux rocketmouse]# cat /run/media/rocketmouse/q/boot/grub/grub.cfg set timeout=8 set default='0'; if [ x"$default" = xsaved ]; then load_env; set default="$saved_entry"; fi set color_normal='light-blue/black'; set color_highlight='light-cyan/blue' menuentry "FreeBSD"[snip] Still not well maintained, but at least better than an auto-generated grub.cfg and much faster to set up than using the configuration files to configure this configuration file. What next? Having a GUI to configure the configuration files for the configuration file? And than a GUI to configure the GUI, that does configure the [snip] ;)? -- Oskar Sala - Elektronische Impressionen Nr. 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJoRIlb6kTs Firefox 19.0.2 doesn't need a Plugin to play the video. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
