On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:36 PM, <jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If a better response time from the kernel is something that's Good, why > isn't lowlatency kernels a default in Linux distros (well, at least in Linux > Mint and Fedora) If it is So Good, what are the arguments for not having a > lowlatency kernel by default ? Any drawbacks ? I presume the > Audio-oriented Linux distros do have lowlatency kernels by default, do they > ? Ubuntu Studio uses low-latency kernel by default, and I am pretty sure some of the other multimedia distros do also. -- Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world." -- Jelaleddin Rumi _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
