Re: Basic question about use of a lowlatency kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:36 PM, <jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If a better response time from the kernel is something that's Good, why isn't lowlatency kernels a default in Linux distros (well, at least in Linux Mint and Fedora)  If it is So Good, what are the arguments for not having a lowlatency kernel by default ? 

latency and bandwidth are opposing goals. server oriented  (compute-based or storage-based) systems want to have the highest possible bandwidth, not the lowest latency. generally, at least.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux