Re: Basic question about use of a lowlatency kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 18/02/2013 21:36, jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx ha scritto:
If a better response time from the kernel is something that's Good, why
isn't lowlatency kernels a default in Linux distros (well, at least in
Linux Mint and Fedora)  If it is So Good, what are the arguments for not
having a lowlatency kernel by default ?  Any drawbacks ?  I presume the
Audio-oriented Linux distros do have lowlatency kernels by default, do
they ?


You can find some information here:
http://www.jackaudio.org/realtime_vs_realtime_kernel

I don't use a RT kernel, I manage to get good low latency with the hardware I have.

--
Federico
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux