Re: looking for command-line/scriptable mastering software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Grekim <grekimj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

It's too bad the closed source issue has rubbed you guys the wrong way.  The way I see it, I've invested well over 1000 hours and a year of work on something which I ask nothing for in return except maybe a little respect now and then :) 

You're not likely to get any respect from this community unless/until you release your source code under a free/libre license. Who have spent decades and 10's of thousands of hours working on projects that we give away freely and openly, your software is irrelevant and your request for respect is borderline insulting. If you're truly proud of what you've created, then show it to the world. You're not getting the feedback you want because no one wants to run your mysterious binary blob, and I don't blame them. You're never going to strike it rich with this software, so the only legitimate reason you could possibly have for not sharing the source code is that you're ashamed of what a mess it is.


 
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux