Ecasound or Nama may indeed be a better fit for this users project. The
only real disadvantage I can think of in my program is that automation
is currently limited to track and submix volumes, so if you need to
de-ess or kill noise for a few seconds somewhere, you'd have to jump
through a few hoops.
For the record:
1 The delay based panning is quite neat and it obviously only affects
mono tracks. Stereo tracks can be balanced in the traditional way.
2 Not sure what the gripe is about integers. My summing is exact
because of it. The effects are 64 bit double floats.
3 Yes, it is stereo, not surround sound if that's what was meant.
4 The session and audio files can be in a different directory than the
binary.
On 11/22/2012 08:16 AM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:02:05PM -0500, Peter Lutek wrote:
seriously.... Mixer4 does a lot of exactly that, and is
an offline, text-based program. (think Lilypond, but for audio.)
seriously...
* Closed source.
* Session files and binary in the same directory...
* No editing.
* Integers only.
* Stereo only.
* Delay based panning...
* ...
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
