Re: Simple hardware & software for digitizing analog audio recordings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/17/2012 02:24 PM, Adam wrote:
Adam wrote:
From what you and others have said here, and user reviews online, I've
ordered a Behringer UCA-202 from Amazon.

Just to follow up, I've been using the Behringer UCA-202 for a few days
now on some of my analog recordings. So far I'm quite happy with it and
would recommend it to others looking for an inexpensive (under US $40)
but decent way to digitize existing analog recordings. The only
"configuration" needed was "set AUDIODEV=hw:1" in the terminal window
I'm using for 'rec'. Thanks again for everyone's suggestions, and
especially for pointing me toward useful tools I was totally unaware of.

On my Sid system, sometimes the UCA comes up on HW:1, sometimes HW:0. On Debian Lenny, telling JACK to use "hw:default" was most consistent, but Sid seems to have changed that. So sometimes hw:1 is the laptop's built-in Intel audio.

--
David
gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux