Re: WG: [slightly OT] Musical citation (what is allowed?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"as soon as you make money with a piece building upon long samples or that you cover, you should pay a share to the original authors/producers"

would not agree with that, tbh. sounds like lawful jealousy!
in my view, you CAN pay a share, if you want to, but you should not be obliged to do that.

I understand that some or even many people might not agree with me on that one. But I also wonder how much of that disagreement
would come from actual analysis and how much from just the stereotype that if you "use someone else's stuff to make money, you now owe them too".

The concept of royalties is something I could never justify. A "royalties" concept is something I have never been comfortable with, as it has either a tendency to overpay or else pressure not to use the work.

Just my 2 cents.
(I will not be debating this here, so as not to turn yet another great LAU topic into a copyright discussion. Anyone interested can proceed to my site or write me a personal email.)

Louigi.
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux