Re: OT - Digital Rights

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/24/2011 08:37 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:13 PM, alexander<axeldenstore@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

All it takes is a revolution of the mind.. these things takes a long time
tho.. and all the anti piracy fud/propaganda wont make it faster...

Imo it's absurd that you can charge 0,89€ for a locked down mp3 and get away
with it.. I mean, the profit margins are 100%.. or well, they start out at ~
-99.999...% and rise, approaching 99.99999999999999...% the more people who
buy it.
what an interesting claim. perhaps you explain to me how it is that
this is for sale at (typically) US$0.49 per track:
Didn't know about that place. Perhaps digital copies will slowly go down to sane levels..
    http://www.emusic.com/listen/#/album/Global-Illage-Sushilove-Sessions-MP3-Download/12031810.html:

and yet I'm still several thousand dollars in debt from the process
that led to its creation? (this wasn't supposed to be a blatant ad,
but if it turns out to be seen as such, my apologies).
Well in the worst case it's because people simply don't like it.. but then, what is good music? I've pondered about this on a personal level, and I can honestly say that I still don't know what makes me like a certain song or band.. also, when making that. Did you expect to make up for the production cost? if not, the whole money issues doesn't really mather.. or perhaps you made it to make money? in that case it's all about marketing and making simple music that sounds like the stuff you hear on the most popular radio stations, but mostly it's really about getting known.... If you are really famous, you could probably sell your own poo on ebay and make a living out of it.

you seem to have this idea that every piece of recorded music always
makes enough in sales to pay for its production. i can't cite anything
right now, but my impression is that the opposite is actually more
correct - a (huge?) majority recorded music never makes back its
costs. that's why major selling albums were so critical to the
recorded music industry of the last 50 years.

this is partly why businesses like emusic and itunes are so ideally
positioned: like the major labels of the past, they don't have a stake
in whether or not any particular album/tracks sell particularly well,
only that the overall aggregate sales from their catalog are high,
since they take a cut on every sale. they don't care if the sale was
Yet Another Lady Gaga or Maestro Boris and His Yucatan Yodellers.
better still, they don't even face any of the costs of producing
Boris' music, so even if it never sells a single copy, its not an
issue for them to list it (their marginal cost is close to zero). the
financial risks they face are almost entirely related to technology,
fraud and large scale deals with distributors - their risks from
actual sales numbers are minimal.

all of which means that you need to be fairly careful when you say
things like "the profit margins are 100%". there's more to recorded
music than selling/distributing it. it has to exist first, and this is
not a zero cost activity (more or less).
And that is why I also said; "..or well, they start out at ~ -99.999...% and rise, approaching 99.99999999999999...% the more people who buy it."

note the minus there infront of the first 99.999...% And yes I get your point that not all songs rise above 0% and here again lies that crucial questions of what makes a song sell, and if you make (record) music to make money or not. Live gigging is a whole other topic, cannot be copied yet... intelligent holograms anyone?

The thing that bothers me with the current approach is that the price is set just as it was physical things that we sell, but it isn't. I mean I understand that the price for an actual CD can be 10-20€ but with digital distribution there are so many middle hands and steps that simply can be bypassed. On the otherhand I don't live in the world of commercial music so my opinion doesn't really mather, my music http://sharpattack.bandcamp.com/ ;D will be free at least for the time being, till I actually learn how to properly play the instruments and as I look for my sound... Will never cost 0,5€ per track tho, the financing schemes I've been interested in are name your price @ 0 - unlimited, or somekind of 'buy out system' or some really advanced 'song share holding system' that I pondered about some time ago. Where the first few buyers pay alot and as more and more people buy into it they get their money back :P
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux