On 3/5/11, Thomas Vecchione wrote: >> I heartily disagree. Tweaking OS to get things done comes *before* you >> start meddling with Ardour and isn't required all the time. > > The problem is that most of the time it is. Is it? Why? >> That makes >> it possible to just write an Appendix that will cover several >> distributions, while bloody well focusing on Ardour. So what's the >> problem? >> > In that case you are writing a manual for Ardour, so wanna join the work > already in progress that you just wrote about?;) Well, *my* problem is that I never used PT and so far don't even intend to. Contributing to other parts of the manual is something I'd like to do as soon as I learn to clone myself and let the new fella work on projects I never had time for :) > Of course the appendixes would require constant maintenence and would be > exceedinly numerous as there are numerous distributions used in pro audio on > Linux. That, I think but am not certain, is why the FLOSS manual covered > Ubuntu to a limited degree and left it there. Trying to cover all of them > is quite challenging and requires much more time than they had. > > Of course that being said just triyng to cover all of what Ardour can do is > challenging in itself, trust me:) You are saying that to someone who spent not the worst 6 years of his life working as tecnical writer ;-) Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
