Re: benchmark for jack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/28/10 18:09, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield
> <gabrbedd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Is any of this work available publicly?
> Florian Faber is the point guard on this. Not sure if he wants to let
> it out or not. It really turned out to be VERY hard to effectively
> test JACK thorougly.

Everything I did is published on wiki.linuxaudio.org:

http://wiki.linuxproaudio.org/index.php/jack_performance_measurement
http://wiki.linuxproaudio.org/index.php/jack:latency_measurement
http://wiki.linuxproaudio.org/index.php/jack:dsp_benchmark

I'm not sure anybody has ever done systematic testings of system
parametrers before. Unfortunately my measurements were invalid due to a
bug at that time in jack's buffer managment, but I welcome anybody to
resume work on that topic.


Flo
-- 
Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.
public key DA43FEF4          x-hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux