On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:00:11PM -0700, Ken Restivo wrote: > Last I was following this, Paul was saying fairly consistently that jackdmp was intended to replace jackd. Newer codebase, better implementation, C++ not C, multi-core, etc etc. > > Has that position changed while I wasn't paying attention? Apparently it has, AFAICS the result of - personal preferences or allergies of some of the jack1 developers who would probably drop out if jack1 is declared 'dead', - and Sletz and the jack2 team not being too eager to take it all on their shoulders alone. Ciao, -- FA O tu, che porte, correndo si ? E guerra e morte ! _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
