On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:47:21AM +0200, Philipp ??berbacher wrote: > Excerpts from Brent Busby's message of 2010-06-03 12:43:39 +0200: > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, david wrote: > > > > > I don't know all those details. JackDMP 1.9.x works here where I > > > couldn't get JACK 0.116 to work. But I've only got lowly single-core > > > processors here. > > > > Hmm... That's mostly what I was wanting to know. I've heard the 0.x > > series is more mature, and I've been using it -- but does that mean the > > 1.x series is deprecated? Is it working for most people? > > Neither is the successor of the other, neither is deprecated. It's two > implementations developed in parallel. Wait, what? Last I was following this, Paul was saying fairly consistently that jackdmp was intended to replace jackd. Newer codebase, better implementation, C++ not C, multi-core, etc etc. Has that position changed while I wasn't paying attention? -ken _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
