On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Renato <rennabh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems that a more definitive solution would need a partial rewriting > of JACK itself. you're on the wrong mailing list :) > OTOH the only active development that is being made to solve this whole > session management problem is on LADI. not so. the has been very active discussion and even more active coding in the jack community, particularly by torben, in the very recent past (right up until now, in fact). --p _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
