Re: bare minimum session handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> On 04/03/2010, Dieter Plaetinck<dieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>    
>> The fact that they need more then 60k sloc is imho a signal that it's
>> going in the wrong direction. (yes, even counting the gui etc)
>> Much of this is personal preference, but in cases like this I take a
>> simple textbased application over a (bloated) GUI-tool.
>>      
> That should not be a problem if and when the session manager is
> working seamlessly behind the scenes.
>
>    



60k is hardly bloat when you look at the amount of work and 
functionality that has been achieved with LADI so far.



Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd


_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux