On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:16:38PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Renato <rennabh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > It seems that a more definitive solution would need a partial rewriting > > of JACK itself. > > you're on the wrong mailing list :) > > > OTOH the only active development that is being made to solve this whole > > session management problem is on LADI. > > not so. the has been very active discussion and even more active > coding in the jack community, particularly by torben, in the very > recent past (right up until now, in fact). the patch for jack1 and tschack is mostly done. maybe a few small kinks. working on jack2 fries my brain a bit, so this patch might take a little longer. patches for seq24 and jack-rack are functional. but dont have conditional compilation yet. i have patches for the ardours, oom and fst which use an old version of the API but i can change them to the current one within minutes. there is a python session manager which can be used as a commandline tool, or as daemon with a very simple dbus api. jsweeper is the only app that has support for this api yet. building a tray app should be no problem. -- torben Hohn _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
