On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 21:25 +0000, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Bob van der Poel <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Oh, and the link you post really assumes that everyone is using ELM. I > > used that program in the 1980s ... I think this is 2010 :) Maybe I > > need to put on my reverse-time-suit :) > > If you've never received a potentially embarrassing personal email > inadvertently via a public mailing list, you clearly haven't been > around for as long as... > > Hey -- hang on -- you've been around for ages! > > Either you're very careful and you look away discreetly when other > people do weird things, or you've mostly been hanging out on lists > that don't do reply-to munging. Me, I don't really want to see > another "hey! how are you? I'm fine, just about to divorce so-and-so" > or "you guys really sold me out on that audio reseller deal"... No, I > really don't. > > The arguments about convenience are mostly moot, you could argue > either side. The difference in seriousness of the most common "user > failure" case is the argument that surely matters most. As well as the fact that reply-to munging removes options (reply, reply all, and reply list ALL do the same thing). _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
