I've ended up by configuring gmail to "reply to all" for everything. Oh, and the link you post really assumes that everyone is using ELM. I used that program in the 1980s ... I think this is 2010 :) Maybe I need to put on my reverse-time-suit :) On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Marc-Olivier Barre <marco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 19:14:26 +0100, Andras Simon <szajmi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm pretty sure that the list server can be configured to put the >> list's address in the Reply-To field. That way, there's no need for >> MUA-specific tricks. >> >> Just my 2 cents. >> >> Andras > > NO, NO, NO > > Read here : http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > This is not subject to debate. > > -- > Marc-Olivier Barre > XMPP ID : marco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > www.MarcOChapeau.org > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user > -- **** Listen to my CD at http://www.mellowood.ca/music/cedars **** Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA ** EMAIL: bob@xxxxxxxxxxxx WWW: http://www.mellowood.ca _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
