Re: Linux audio app design: The nature of xruns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Mon, 28. Dec 2009 um 07:24:24 -0500 schrieb lanas:

Hi "lanas",

>   From this it is obvious that the application layer helps a lot
> in promoting xruns.  It is safe to assume that Qarecord is a
> quick hack.  But, there's seemingly a big difference in
> application design regarding the handling of audio/jack stuff
> between Qarecord and Ardour since one produces a festival of
> xruns and the other none.

as far as I understood your experiment, you compared these two setups to
conclude "QARecord is to blame":

  1) noise -> jackmix -> QARecord -> wav-file
  2) noise -> Ardour -> wav-file

For mathematical reasons I would like to get your result from this
alternative setup (also giving better access to a root cause):

  3) noise -> jackmix -> Ardour -> wav-file

Some other interesting information would be, what program versions
(jackmix, QARecord) are you using?

Guido

-- 
http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/
http://www.lug-burghausen.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux