Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 08:09 -0500, drew Roberts wrote: >> On Thursday 03 December 2009 05:04:26 Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >>>> Oh, I was thinking Golden Arch Linux would be the paid-support version >>>> of Arch Linux. >>> Quite difficult to have a 'paid-support' version of a distro that's not >>> owned/managed by a company =). >> Yup, but not too difficult to have paid support for a distro that's not >> owned/managed by a company.Right? >> >> all the best, >> >> drew > I guess. Doubt it'd be a good economic prospect in any case, considering > the user base either:- > a) doesn't need your help > b) needs your help but won't pay for it cos "OMGZZ THIS ISN'T WINDOWS > WHY SHOULD I PAY" > > Disclaimer: I use Arch myself, and I know very very few users who fall > into b). Few isn't none, however =) Well, I've bought Linux software in the past when FOSS software couldn't do what I needed it to, so there are folk who buy Linux software. I even bought my first Linux distro (CorelLinux). -- David gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx authenticity, honesty, community _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
