On Thursday 03 December 2009 05:04:26 Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > Oh, I was thinking Golden Arch Linux would be the paid-support version > > of Arch Linux. > > Quite difficult to have a 'paid-support' version of a distro that's not > owned/managed by a company =). Yup, but not too difficult to have paid support for a distro that's not owned/managed by a company.Right? all the best, drew _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
