On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 08:09 -0500, drew Roberts wrote: > On Thursday 03 December 2009 05:04:26 Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > > Oh, I was thinking Golden Arch Linux would be the paid-support version > > > of Arch Linux. > > > > Quite difficult to have a 'paid-support' version of a distro that's not > > owned/managed by a company =). > > Yup, but not too difficult to have paid support for a distro that's not > owned/managed by a company.Right? > > all the best, > > drew I guess. Doubt it'd be a good economic prospect in any case, considering the user base either:- a) doesn't need your help b) needs your help but won't pay for it cos "OMGZZ THIS ISN'T WINDOWS WHY SHOULD I PAY" Disclaimer: I use Arch myself, and I know very very few users who fall into b). Few isn't none, however =) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
