> Sure it was made possible by Qt4, point is that they put more effort
> into porting it to windows than to fix existing issues, and there
> really are plenty, not only jack related. In my eyes it's a mountain of
> bugs held together by a shiny GUI.
> into porting it to windows than to fix existing issues, and there
> really are plenty, not only jack related. In my eyes it's a mountain of
> bugs held together by a shiny GUI.
No, they do not "put more effort into porting it to windows". I have observed their development, albeit passively, for quite some time to know where their efforts lie. Just because they implement something new while issues remain to be open does not mean they no longer give more importance to those issues.
>Prettifying its UI ought to be a secondary consideration until
>reliable audio stability is achieved.
There is an unnecessary amount of assumption and indirect hostility here. They are not "prioritising" the "prettification" over pressing issues, but they simply do not have solutions. When there is no solution to a pressing issue, one doesn't "wait it out". If there are other areas where improvement can be made and an external party is taking the initiative (someone volunteered to redesign the UI), then would you not, as a developer, entertain that effort? Or would you rather tell the initiator to "wait until we solve those" when you don't even have a "due-in-version"?
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
