-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Paul Davis schrieb: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The problem is known amongst the lmms-people yet tobydox is not that >> eager to lay hands on it since lmms works OK with alsa and is more or >> less designed to be a one-stop-suite. > > it works because it has more buffering when run like that. so, either > run JACK with more buffering OR fix lmms. at ease .... > I have tested it extensively and found, that the buffers need to be incredible high - 2048 worked for me :| the internal buffer size in lmms needs to be set exactly the same. With that you even have a clearly recognizable delay when doing stuff in the piano roll let alone playing a keyboard. And still it works not as stable as with alsa... I met the lmms people at a fair here in Germ and I cannot remember seeing them use jackd. They really designed lmms to be a single suite running with alsa without a need to interact with other jack-apps. So coming up with some good practical reasons to have lmms integrated in jackd running with acceptable latencies and asking them for it on IRC could be reasonable. best regs HZN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrQROAACgkQ1Aecwva1SWPjBgCdGrHY2wfmAROGJWBgMlQeHS+u yIQAn39B3/NTNvWFwwmdMAwKEVDTC1XM =9EoB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
