On 10/10/2009 09:06 PM, hollunder@xxxxxx wrote: > On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:51:50 +0800 > Ray Rashif<schivmeister@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> they're more interested in porting lmms to window >>> than to fix jack issues >>> >> No, the Windows port was a byproduct partly made possible by Qt4 :) >> The JACK issue was there from the beginning, I had approached them >> some 2 years ago to whine (thinking it was PEBKAC). It's something >> they don't really have a solution to, so someone can enlighten them >> or send in a patch. >> > Sure it was made possible by Qt4, point is that they put more effort > into porting it to windows than to fix existing issues, and there > really are plenty, not only jack related. In my eyes it's a mountain of > bugs held together by a shiny GUI. > Of course coming from someone who doesn't write any useful software > that could be seen as an offence, but it should not be taken personal. > I haven't had a chance to try out lmms yet. What are the main show stoppers apart from the jack issue that you encountered? Cheers. Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
