Re: [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Brent Busby <brent@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Newbie question:  Is it harmful to have QJackctl and Ardour both running
> at the same time?  Do they have to potential to fight eachother, or to
> make changes to the Jack environment that will be made by one but not
> realized by the other, either in regard to jackd parameters, or in
> regard to the connection patchbays?

There is no harm whatsoever. Ardour will write, and QJackctl can
write, ~/.jackdrc so that auto-started JACK servers will be created
with the same parameters as "last time". But if JACK is already
running, Ardour does nothing like this, and ditto for QJackctl. As Rui
has pointed out, its even an option whether or not QJackctl writes
this file at all.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux