Re: [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 17 May 2009 09:58:47 -0500 (CDT)
Brent Busby <brent@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Newbie question:  Is it harmful to have QJackctl and Ardour both running 
> at the same time?  Do they have to potential to fight eachother, or to 
> make changes to the Jack environment that will be made by one but not 
> realized by the other, either in regard to jackd parameters, or in 
> regard to the connection patchbays?

I always start jack with qjackctl when I'm running ardour.  When ardour
sees the running instance of jack, it uses it.  Perhaps that behavior
could be changed, but it's just how I want it.

-- 
======================================================================
       Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh@xxxxxxxxxxxx
 Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux