Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Brent Busby <brent@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Newbie question: Is it harmful to have QJackctl and Ardour both running >> at the same time? Do they have to potential to fight eachother, or to >> make changes to the Jack environment that will be made by one but not >> realized by the other, either in regard to jackd parameters, or in >> regard to the connection patchbays? > > There is no harm whatsoever. Ardour will write, and QJackctl can > write, ~/.jackdrc so that auto-started JACK servers will be created > with the same parameters as "last time". But if JACK is already > running, Ardour does nothing like this, and ditto for QJackctl. As Rui > has pointed out, its even an option whether or not QJackctl writes > this file at all. Having two writters to single file without protection (serialization) is call for trouble. I wouldnt call this harmless. Yes, I know probablity is very low. Still it is posible. Also AFAIK qjackctl uses different configuration file and just can export to ~/.jackdrc -- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
Attachment:
pgpJmX6k5aikk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
