On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 13:03 +0100, hollunder@xxxxxx wrote: > Glad it works for you. > But: Upsampling can't make it better(=closer to the original), you > can't magically get stuff that's not there (even if companies like > creative claim so). Very true. But .. > If it sound better now than before something was wrong before or you > like some resampling artifacts ;) .. It's possible that the audio interface has a fixed (96kHz?) clock and uses dubious methods of achieving non-even sampling rates like 44.1k. In that scenario, the software upsampling done by alsa might be better than the presumed bad method done at hw level. Any sane soundcard (= not integrated or creative) wouldn't exhibit this behaviour though. Proper interfaces have proper clocks. Sampo _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
