Re: status of ams

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 03:47:19PM +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> 
> Dave, do you think there is a place for a softsynth that would be
> modular but with a fixed set of modules, everyhing controlled from
> one window, no patch cables, only 'hardware controls' such as
> sliders and switches, each one assignable to MIDI, and of course
> uncompromising audio quality ?
> In other words a synth that would be easy to use and optimised for
> 'live' work, sort of a MiniMoog on steroids ? Polyphonic of course but
> not multi-timbral - just start two or three of them if you need that.


In Om, I often find myself building the usual Osc > Filter > Amp 
chains (or Amp > Filter). A model that builds on suchs chains, 
but allows additional routing could be nice. Maybe with 2 oscs 
and filters per chain. It should allow easy layering and rich 
CC support.

Another concept worth consideration would be a routing matrix, with 
amount of influence in the cells. I asume low to medium complexity 
setups could be done very fast, while a graph should be superior 
for more complex things.


--
Thorsten Wilms

Thorwil's Creature Illustrations:
http://www.printfection.com/thorwil

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux