Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
From: Rob <lau@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 14:50:50 -0400
In-reply-to: <1162053126.5591.12.camel@localhost>
Organization: kudla.org
References: <20061025104229.10208.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <70a871c80610261001l618d9713kfd0a0bf93262537f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1162053126.5591.12.camel@localhost>
Reply-to: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1

On Saturday 28 October 2006 12:32, greg wrote:
> Sorry for the ramble, wmii is
> seriously like, something I had been dreaming about.

Wow, that is seriously the WM equivalent of gentoo.

Rob

References:
- E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: Drucer Ninetynine
- Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: Dmitry Baikov
- Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: greg

Prev by Date: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Next by Date: Re: Just a comment
Previous by thread: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Next by thread: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux