Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
From: "Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter" <paniq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:29:29 +0200
In-reply-to: <20061026035537.GB17238@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20061025104229.10208.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1161779532.5475.12.camel@localhost> <20061026035537.GB17238@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:55 +0800, Chris McCormick wrote:
> So there you have it, E17 gets you chicks. ;)

dang ;)

-- 
-- Leonard Ritter
-- http://www.leonard-ritter.com
-- http://www.paniq.org

References:
- E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: Drucer Ninetynine
- Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: Leonard "paniq" Ritter
- Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
  - From: Chris McCormick

Prev by Date: Re: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Next by Date: Re: Focusrite Saffire Pro 26 I/O
Previous by thread: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Next by thread: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux