Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: "A list for linux audio users" <
linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
From
: "Dmitry Baikov" <
dsbaikov@xxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:01:11 +0400
In-reply-to
: <
4540E85A.6070903@xxxxxxxxxx
>
References
: <
20061025104229.10208.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
1161779532.5475.12.camel@localhost
> <
20061026035537.GB17238@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
20061026053219.GB1411@xxxxxxxxxx
> <
4540E85A.6070903@xxxxxxxxxx
>
Reply-to
: A list for linux audio users <
linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
I used gnome, openbox, xfce, gnome again, and now prefer wmii-3
Follow-Ups
:
Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
From:
greg
References
:
E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
From:
Drucer Ninetynine
Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
From:
Leonard "paniq" Ritter
Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
From:
Chris McCormick
Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
From:
carmen
Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
From:
freak
Prev by Date:
Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Next by Date:
Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Previous by thread:
Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Next by thread:
Re: E17 - our choice of WM in the future?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Sound]
[ALSA Users]
[Pulse Audio]
[ALSA Devel]
[Sox Users]
[Linux Media]
[Kernel]
[Photo Sharing]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux Media]
