Re: JACK samplerate stuck at 48000

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: JACK samplerate stuck at 48000
From: Carlo Capocasa <capocasa@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:47:22 +0200
In-reply-to: <20060621014154.GA18792@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <31157.216.17.51.98.1150821382.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e7a4tk$pqq$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150851163.2754.216.camel@mindpipe> <e7a5k5$sj6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150851944.2754.221.camel@mindpipe> <e7a6l5$vt1$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150853361.2754.226.camel@mindpipe> <20060621014154.GA18792@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060522)

mastering with an onboard consumer card that only supports 16bit/48khz? no thanks :)


I'm so good you won't here a difference.

Carlo

References:
- JACK samplerate stuck at 48000
  - From: Link Swanson
- Re: JACK samplerate stuck at 48000
  - From: Carlo Capocasa
- Re: Re: JACK samplerate stuck at 48000
  - From: Lee Revell
- Re: JACK samplerate stuck at 48000
  - From: Carlo Capocasa
- Re: Re: JACK samplerate stuck at 48000
  - From: Lee Revell
- Re: JACK samplerate stuck at 48000
  - From: Carlo Capocasa
- Re: Re: JACK samplerate stuck at 48000
  - From: Lee Revell
- Re: Re: JACK samplerate stuck at 48000
  - From: carmen

Prev by Date: Re: Re: which graphics card?
Next by Date: Re: JACK samplerate stuck at 48000
Previous by thread: Re: Re: JACK samplerate stuck at 48000
Next by thread: Re: JACK samplerate stuck at 48000
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux