--- Stephen Cameron <smcameron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- R Parker <rtp405@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > It's really a very nice, convenient machine for > tracking. Until you want to record and monitor 8+ tracks. And then it's infuriating. Not so good for editing, and there's no > nice > way to get things into or out of it. Mostly > what little music I do is internet collaborations, > so I end up with a process like this: > > download/decode tracks (mp3 ->wav), burn cds, > import tracks to AW, record my parts, burn cds, > import tracks to pc, encode/upload. Rather tedious. I think you can redesign for a much better studio. Is your PC hardware capable of running jackd without xruns? > Would be nice to transform that process to: > > download/decode tracks, transfer to AW over ADAT > cables, record my parts, transfer to PC over ADAT > cables, encode/upload tracks. Don't use the HDR but use the mixer and monitoring interfaces with i/o routed to the RME card all the time. Record to the AW HDR at a remote locations; practice space, bar, etc. I'm looking at your setup while occupied with something else. Am I overlooking your reasons for recording to the AW? Ron > That's where I'm trying to get to. > > -- steve > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
