Re: LKML: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hallo,
Lee Revell hat gesagt: // Lee Revell wrote:

> It was just a suggestion.  Many users distro-hop frequently these days
> anyway to get support for all their hardware so I thought this would be
> easier for some than figuring out how to patch two critical packages
> (PAM and glibc) with TONS of dependencies.

Maybe I'm just oldskool: I installed my main Debian machine several
years ago (I guess 7 or 8) and never reinstalled it, I only did
upgrades.

> And I think it's kind of silly that this problem was solved a year and a
> half ago and there distros that have yet to get with the program ;-)

Yes, that's true. But while relatime-lsm may be deprecated, it still
is supported in 2.6.16 and so the pressure on distros isn't that high.
OTOH even the official PAM only recently (0.80?) included the rlimits
module.

Btw: I just built and installed the latest Debian testing
libpam-modules sources (0.79-3) after applying the patch from
ubuntustudio. There was a harmless reject when patching which only
affected the README. During short testing (logging out and in,
starting jackd -R) it looks like it works okay.

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux