On 4/17/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 23:10 +0200, Christoph Eckert wrote: > > > This thread is happening on the Linux Kernel Mailing List. Since > > > I'm not a programmer I don't understand the full ramifications. Can > > > someone here tell me would this render the realtime-lsm module > > > unusable and if so what would I have to do to get realtime operation > > > without realtime-lsm? > > > > this would be horrible because my machine doesn't boot a patched kernel. > > > > Didn't test the recent vanilla kernels, though. I heard these are very > > audio friendly without furtzer patching? > > You are confusing the -rt patch which improves the kernel's realtime > performance with the realtime LSM which provides access to realtime > scheduling to non-root users. > > The realtime LSM is really no longer needed as PAM or set_rtlimits > solves the problem without requiring a kernel patch Lee, I know nothing about set_rtlimits and wouldn't know how to use it. Where can I find a good walk through on doing that instead of using realtime-lsm like I am today? Thanks, Mark
