Re: Digital Fidelity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Digital Fidelity
From: Carlo Capocasa <capocasa@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:12:27 +0100
In-reply-to: <du1mtr$o52$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20060227204125.4CB8D82FC37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200602271952330910.02A45BE7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1141120945.29181.27.camel@eviltwin> <du1co0$hot$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1141132839.2432.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <du1mtr$o52$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)

(I might add, as one of your great admirers, that I feel deeply honored
by having a scientific discussion with you)

Carlo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Digital Fidelity
  - From: Dan Easley

References:
- Re: Digital Fidelity
  - From: Maluvia
- Re: Re: Digital Fidelity
  - From: Jan Depner
- Re: Digital Fidelity
  - From: Carlo Capocasa
- Re: Re: Digital Fidelity
  - From: Paul Davis
- Re: Digital Fidelity
  - From: Carlo Capocasa

Prev by Date: Re: debian unstable kernel - low latency? preemptive? realtime-lsm?
Next by Date: Re: Making a room sound smaller
Previous by thread: Re: Digital Fidelity
Next by thread: Re: Re: Digital Fidelity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux