On 2/6/06, leslie.polzer@xxxxxxx <leslie.polzer@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello Loki, > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:11:58AM +1100, Loki Davison wrote: > > > As i said originally, om is big and powerful with it's standard gui. > > The engine however is very light weight > > Also in terms of dependencies? > > > if it were lighter than jack rack and more stable. > > Don't forget that we are talking about a complete rewrite of JACK Rack 1 > (which is quite stable in its own right). > > Leslie > > -- > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289 > http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/ > > >From the om site. The Om engine (which can be built by itself) requires: Liblo 0.22 and above Jack 0.99 and above. And can optionally use: Alsa sequencer DSSI LADSPA It would also be great for overworked Dave to get some help ;-) Loki
