Re: Re: Need for JACK Rack (2)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Loki,

On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:11:58AM +1100, Loki Davison wrote:

> As i said originally, om is big and powerful with it's standard gui.
> The engine however is very light weight

Also in terms of dependencies?

> if it were lighter than jack rack and more stable.

Don't forget that we are talking about a complete rewrite of JACK Rack 1
(which is quite stable in its own right).

  Leslie

-- 
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289
http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/

Attachment: pgp8w5dYXfEDg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux