--- Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:14:39 +0100 > leslie.polzer@xxxxxxx wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 10:33:32AM -0500, Dave > Phillips wrote: > > > > > I use it all the time, mainly when working with > synths like QSynth and > > > amSynth. I like it a lot. :) > > > > > > What other tools ? > > Loki Davison and another guy mentioned "om" > earlier in this thread, and > > I wonder whether it makes JACK Rack obsolete. > > > > See http://www.nongnu.org/om-synth/ . > > No, > > while om-synth can do all that jack-rack can do, it > takes a little more > work for the user to do so. jack-rack's advantage is > its simple > straightforward approach to a common need. And > om-synth's advantage is > its power :) IMHO they can very happily coexist. And there is no om-synth for FC3 + CCRMA ron > Flo > > -- > Palimm Palimm! > http://tapas.affenbande.org > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com