Re: Need for JACK Rack (2)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--- Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:14:39 +0100
> leslie.polzer@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 10:33:32AM -0500, Dave
> Phillips wrote:
> > 
> > > I use it all the time, mainly when working with
> synths like QSynth and
> > > amSynth. I like it a lot. :)
> > >
> > > What other tools ?
> > Loki Davison and another guy mentioned "om"
> earlier in this thread, and
> > I wonder whether it makes JACK Rack obsolete.
> > 
> >   See http://www.nongnu.org/om-synth/ .
> 
> No,
> 
> while om-synth can do all that jack-rack can do, it
> takes a little more
> work for the user to do so. jack-rack's advantage is
> its simple
> straightforward approach to a common need. And
> om-synth's advantage is
> its power :) IMHO they can very happily coexist.

And there is no om-synth for FC3 + CCRMA

ron

> Flo
> 
> -- 
> Palimm Palimm!
> http://tapas.affenbande.org
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux