Esben Stien escribe:
> Brent Busby <brent@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > we'd like to have enough resolution to reproduce the waveforms
>
> This is exactly what the Nyquist theorem promises. You can reproduce
> any signal below SR/2. If this signal is not a sine wave, then it must
> contain more higher frequencies and at that time, you don't follow the
> Nyquist rule. Only two values are enough to mathematically reproduce
> an exact waveform; even more precise than you can sample it.
Yes! These are maths, and I wouldn't mess about maths, they always
win.
Cordially, Ismael
--
Tout fourmille de commentaries, d'auteurs il en est grande cherté
http://lamediahostia.blogspot.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ivalladt/
