Re: 192kHz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Knecht escribe:
> On 1/26/06, Joe Hartley <jh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:28:08 +0100
> > Carlo Capocasa <capocasa@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > My question, how useful is 192kHz for practical purposes? How quickly is
> > > that likely to change? I'd really appreciate some advice here, thank you.
> >
> > I've got a card that does 24/96 (a Delta 1010).  In a side by side test,
> > I _think_ my old ears hear the slightest of differences between recordings
> > done at 24/96 and those done at 16/44, but in the end, I decided to save
> > the disk space and always record at 16/44, since everything I do is going to
> > get resampled to that anyway for CDs.
> 
> I saw a 400GB 1394/USB2 drive at Fry's yesterday for $219... ;-)

Is USB2 convenient for recording?

Cordially, Ismael
-- 
Tout fourmille de commentaries, d'auteurs il en est grande cherté

     http://lamediahostia.blogspot.com/
     http://www.flickr.com/photos/ivalladt/


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux