On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 14:53 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 23:40 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 19:43 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote: > > > > Shock! Horror! I used to think that SoundBlaster are decent cards - > > well, now, after getting used to the SB sound and migrating to 1010... > > there's a clear difference! > > Not suprised, but to be completely fair the SBLive Value does have the > cheapest codecs and worst S/N ratio of all of them. So that's not an > entirely fair comparison. It is a $30 sound card after all. True. > Also did you use the rear channels as your mains? It's fairly well > documented that the ADC used for the rear channels on sblive cards is > much better quality. I didn't know that. But, frankly, now i don't care. :-) -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/
