On Thursday 10 March 2005 04:53 pm, Christoph Eckert wrote: > Hi, > > > If it is not open enough to take advantage of then is there > > any truly open soundfont-like standard anywhere on the > > planet? > > for me it somehow looks as there's need to define a new, > absolutely free file format for sampling data. > SoundFont != just sample data. If anything is an architecture for wavetable synthesis and a parameter storage format > Unfortunately, this would need lots of time and resources, and > as 'we' are not enough users, it wouldn't be spread widely > enough. > It might be feasible to spec something compatible though. IMO it would still be redundant. > > Best regards > > > ce
