On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 23:12 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 12:49 -0500, Jan Depner wrote: > > "a real sticking issue is the fact that it looks so drastically > > different from the rest of my GNOME driven desktop (Ardour uses GTK) > > and is rather unintuitive". Ooh, it's not esthetically pleasing. > > Give me a break. Yes, Ardour is complicated, duh. > > This is a completely valid point, compared to the rest of my Gnome > (2.10) desktop Ardour looks like shit (to be fair, so does gmplayer). > > How hard would it be to port Ardour to GTK 2.x/GNOME2? That's the plan for Ardour 2.0. -- Lars Luthman PGP key: http://www.d.kth.se/~d00-llu/pgp_key.php Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20050723/ba7f6c6c/attachment.bin
