On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 12:49 -0500, Jan Depner wrote: > "a real sticking issue is the fact that it looks so drastically > different from the rest of my GNOME driven desktop (Ardour uses GTK) > and is rather unintuitive". Ooh, it's not esthetically pleasing. > Give me a break. Yes, Ardour is complicated, duh. This is a completely valid point, compared to the rest of my Gnome (2.10) desktop Ardour looks like shit (to be fair, so does gmplayer). How hard would it be to port Ardour to GTK 2.x/GNOME2? Lee
