On 27.01.22 09:42, Wim Taymans wrote: >> Speaking of PipeWire as a potential JACK replacement, what's the status >> of JACK Transport? there are hints in the FAQ [1] and an old version of >> the Wiki [2] > > All of the JACK functionality should be implemented, this includes > reposition, start/stop, > slow-sync clients, timebase master. > > At the lower levels there are some extensions that are not yet exposed > in any API (And I have no > real plan on how to do this yet..): > > * multiple timebase owners for different aspects (bars-beat, video, ...) > * reposition to other than frames, ie bar/beat, video frames, etc > * reposition requests can have a duration + looping flag. > * variable rate playback/reverse > * an 8 slot lookahead windows for repositions and tempo changes (let clients > prefetch data in time) Are there any plans for porting PipeWire to other operating systems like windows or macOS? I think it is a great feature of jack that is available not only on Linux (despite the fact that my audio work is 100% linux-based). Giso > > Wim > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
