Christopher Arndt <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Am 14.02.21 um 09:01 schrieb Sam Kuper: >> I no longer think the licensing model can be separated from the >> usefulness of the tool. > I fully agree with this sentiment and the things you said afterwards. > > Licensing choice isn't just a different flavour or colour of software. > Conversely, choosing a closed license doesn't mean that you don't care > about your product, but it does mean that you restrict the way it can be > used, which, as you point out, makes it less useful (all other factors > being the same). It tends to make a difference whether your primary point of contact is marketing or users. Feature progress in a commercial setting does not make it feasible to have the developers overexposed to people without a view on marketability and possibly communicating in a manner that will drop productivity for days. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
