On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 11:41:26PM +0100, Jeanette C. wrote: > Feb 13 2021, Sam Kuper has written: >> Thank you so much for all the "behind-the-scenes" info, too. I'm >> still new enough to Linux audio that details like this add >> considerably to my understanding of the soundsets, software and >> workflows available. > > Then some good advise: in terms of software and workflow don't look > too closely at what I'm doing. It's rather unorthodox in terms of > tools and thus - to some extent - in terms of workflow. Thanks, I'm still interested though. I'm non-neurotypical, so some unorthodox tools or workflows might work better for me than popular software. Back when I used proprietary software, I frequently found the major DAWs unergonomic. Partly that was due to the license/upgrade cycle, but often the problem was the UI or the developers' assumptions about users' workflows. Your output is prolific and high quality, so whatever tools you are using, they are clearly capable of supporting both those properties. That makes them of interest to me. I'm still just learning the Linux audio landscape, so I have little to lose (and potentially much to gain) by reading the documentation for software I had not heard of before, like Nama. > You will find a lot of good work, setups, tools and workflow here > though. If it isn't spelled out directly, you can always ask and > people will be happy to talk. Thank you :) -- A: When it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: When is top-posting a bad thing? () ASCII ribbon campaign. Please avoid HTML emails & proprietary /\ file formats. (Why? See e.g. https://v.gd/jrmGbS ). Thank you. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
